2008 Dodge Challeger SRT (updated pics)

Started by Flynbyu, July 04, 2008, 11:23:19 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Pw383426

Quote from: who else but rk on July 26, 2008, 09:38:51 PM
the light weight version ? it didnt have a wing or anything on it?

Wings are just extra unneeded weight  ;)

who else but rk

no no what im saying is they made a special wrx that was a wrx sti but jsut had the regualr  wrx body work. no big spoiler
2008 KTM 250xc-f
pumpkin lover

kyledvor61

Quote from: Flynbyu on July 29, 2008, 04:02:11 PM
Quote from: kyledvor61 on July 29, 2008, 03:49:14 PM
Quote from: who else but rk on July 29, 2008, 01:57:23 PM
i kno that quote lol
the black challenger to me is diferent. i havent seen too many of them. and ive seen even lesser pics of the black
yes the orange is classic challenger, but i like the plum crazy or whatever the purple is called better  :grin_nod:

plum crazy purple is the only color mopar id have if i had one  :nana:


or maybe stealth black :batman:

Plum crazy would be BAD ASS!!!

~Brian

plum crazy with black stripes, orange with black stripes and stealth black with all the trim, rims and windows all black would be bitchin.




for a mopar anyway

Colorado700R

Quote from: Pw383426 on July 29, 2008, 04:05:04 PM
Quote from: who else but rk on July 26, 2008, 09:38:51 PM
the light weight version ? it didnt have a wing or anything on it?

Wings are just extra unneeded weight  ;)

You mean the rear wings that apply down force to the rear of a front wheel drive car aren't effective?

:lol:

kyledvor61

Quote from: Pw383426 on July 29, 2008, 04:05:04 PM
Quote from: who else but rk on July 26, 2008, 09:38:51 PM
the light weight version ? it didnt have a wing or anything on it?

Wings are just extra unneeded weight  ;)

then why do dragsters have them?

Pw383426

Quote from: kyledvor61 on July 29, 2008, 04:14:03 PM
Quote from: Pw383426 on July 29, 2008, 04:05:04 PM
Quote from: who else but rk on July 26, 2008, 09:38:51 PM
the light weight version ? it didnt have a wing or anything on it?

Wings are just extra unneeded weight  ;)

then why do dragsters have them?

Because they go 300+ mph? Lol.... Comparing a 1500lb Top fuel with 8000 horsepower, that goes 0-100 in .8 seconds is alot different than a 425hp 3400lb car that maxes at 175mph

How often do you see Junior Dragsters with wings?

Colorado700R

Quote from: kyledvor61 on July 29, 2008, 04:14:03 PM
Quote from: Pw383426 on July 29, 2008, 04:05:04 PM
Quote from: who else but rk on July 26, 2008, 09:38:51 PM
the light weight version ? it didnt have a wing or anything on it?

Wings are just extra unneeded weight  ;)

then why do dragsters have them?

A dragsters wing is very functional to apply down force across the total length of the body.  But the average ricer with a Neon with a wing thats not designed specifically for that body style is probably actually unloading down force from the front end of the car during high speed  :lol:

kyledvor61

Quote from: Pw383426 on July 29, 2008, 04:16:44 PM
Quote from: kyledvor61 on July 29, 2008, 04:14:03 PM
Quote from: Pw383426 on July 29, 2008, 04:05:04 PM
Quote from: who else but rk on July 26, 2008, 09:38:51 PM
the light weight version ? it didnt have a wing or anything on it?

Wings are just extra unneeded weight  ;)

then why do dragsters have them?

Because they go 300+ mph? Lol.... Comparing a 1500lb Top fuel with 8000 horsepower, that goes 0-100 in .8 seconds is alot different than a 425hp 3400lb car that maxes at 175mph

How often do you see Junior Dragsters with wings?


http://www.mikeboschassiscraft.com/jr%20dragster%20Gallery.htm

Bert

A car magazine was getting some track time with a Mustang GT & removed the rear wing to gain 3 mph top speed, I say cosmetics  ???

Flynbyu

Quote from: Bert on August 02, 2008, 03:13:36 PM
A car magazine was getting some track time with a Mustang GT & removed the rear wing to gain 3 mph top speed, I say cosmetics  ???

I remember a few years ago when Motor Trend did the "Need for Speed" trials.....the Mustang was duct taped...the hood seams, grill, and a few of the lines on the body just to make it get through the first round. I think they removed the spoiler then too.

~Brian
2003 Yamaha Raptor





Yamaha Raptor Forum

preddy08

Quote from: Flynbyu on August 02, 2008, 03:53:55 PM
Quote from: Bert on August 02, 2008, 03:13:36 PM
A car magazine was getting some track time with a Mustang GT & removed the rear wing to gain 3 mph top speed, I say cosmetics  ???

I remember a few years ago when Motor Trend did the "Need for Speed" trials.....the Mustang was duct taped...the hood seams, grill, and a few of the lines on the body just to make it get through the first round. I think they removed the spoiler then too.

~Brian

Saw another charger today. 5 Mins from the house. Ill post up a pic in the morning.
Just a little 81hp trail bike.


Bert

I know a guy who bought one, he's not letting people sit in it, just look at it  :rofl:
It's black  :thumbs:

russ-russ

#117
Pics of the drag-pack cars:




I'm no mopar fan, but I think these cars are badass, and the Challenger is the best looking retro design car out there.  I love the new Mustang, and I like the retro input it has, but the new Challenger looks much more like the original Challenger.  I really think Chevy shit the bed on the new Camaro, it's not retro cool like the Challenger or the Mustang.  And running all the V6 girl-cars first?  WTF??  Anyone who is really excited about the new Camaro isn't going to want a wee6. ???

Sound and video of drag-pack car: http://videos.streetfire.net/video/Sneak-PeekDodge-drag-car_169344.htm

11Raptor

Quote from: russ on August 03, 2008, 11:08:51 AM
I'm no mopar fan, but I think these cars are badass, and the Challenger is the best looking retro design car out there.  I love the new Mustang, and I like the retro input it has, but the new Challenger looks much more like the original Challenger.  I really think Chevy shit the bed on the new Camaro, it's not retro cool like the Challenger or the Mustang.  And running all the V6 girl-cars first?  WTF??  Anyone who is really excited about the new Camaro isn't going to want a wee6. ???
Sound and video of drag-pack car: http://videos.streetfire.net/video/Sneak-PeekDodge-drag-car_169344.htm

But it's not bad for a V-6 with just over 300hp

Michael
-2K7 Raptor700 SE2
-Houser +3/4 Blue Steering Stem
-Pro Taper Black SE bars
-ProArmor Kill Switch w/wrist teather
-ProArmor Skid Plates
-ProArmor FAT Peg Black Nerf's
-ITP Holeshot XCR's on ITP SS112's machined w/black
-Yoshi RS-2 Full Titanium Exhaust
-Quadbox FI Power Box
-2K5 2500 Dodge Cummins 4x4 QC w/35's
-EDGE w/Att.

Flynbyu

Quote from: 11Raptor on August 03, 2008, 11:56:55 PM
Quote from: russ on August 03, 2008, 11:08:51 AM
I'm no mopar fan, but I think these cars are badass, and the Challenger is the best looking retro design car out there.  I love the new Mustang, and I like the retro input it has, but the new Challenger looks much more like the original Challenger.  I really think Chevy shit the bed on the new Camaro, it's not retro cool like the Challenger or the Mustang.  And running all the V6 girl-cars first?  WTF??  Anyone who is really excited about the new Camaro isn't going to want a wee6. ???
Sound and video of drag-pack car: http://videos.streetfire.net/video/Sneak-PeekDodge-drag-car_169344.htm

But it's not bad for a V-6 with just over 300hp

Michael

+1

300 hp V6 is pretty damn stout.

Especially when it gets 28 mpg on the highway!

~Brian
2003 Yamaha Raptor





Yamaha Raptor Forum