RaptorSource.com
Other/Off-Topic => 'Other' Vids/Pics => Topic started by: Flynbyu on July 21, 2008, 11:43:00 AM
-
Production starts February 2009.
Here's the product. Slight changes from the concept.
(http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c355/Flynbyu1973/Misc%20Pics/CamaroOfficialFront2.jpg)
(http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c355/Flynbyu1973/Misc%20Pics/CamaroOfficialRear1.jpg)
(http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c355/Flynbyu1973/Misc%20Pics/CamaroOfficialInterior1.jpg)
~Brian
-
pics no worky
-
there is suppose to be a press release today go to www.5thgen.org for more pics I am waiting for the convertible
(http://cwimg.sv.publicus.com/apps/pbcsi.dll/bilde?NewTbl=1&Avis=CW&Dato=20080718&Kategori=PHOTOS01&Lopenr=706008190&Ref=PH&Item=5&Maxw=660&q=85)
(http://www.5thgen.org/countdown/BothConcepts1.jpg)
-
$ ?
-
Much better then the prototype IMO. I can't wait to see the numbers it puts down. And if they do a SS package.
-
Much better then the prototype IMO. I can't wait to see the numbers it puts down. And if they do a SS package.
I just hope that they dont do the same old push rod motor that they have been doing for decades!
Honestly how old is the 3.8 liter v-6?? and there still using it? (last I cared to check)
-
Much better then the prototype IMO. I can't wait to see the numbers it puts down. And if they do a SS package.
I just hope that they dont do the same old push rod motor that they have been doing for decades!
Honestly how old is the 3.8 liter v-6?? and there still using it? (last I cared to check)
+1 preddy. the good ole 3800. :rofl: I hope they are not using it. Every damn gm car in the 90's had that clunker in it, from grand ams to camaros. :puke: I am not a big fan of GM, but I would like to see them doing better, being an american company. This one looks pretty sweet.
-
Just an easy copy of what Ford did years ago with the Mustang. I think we all know who has the bawls of the auto industy. Shit, the Mustang was a copy of the thunderbird. That was a cool car, talk about a weird motor, 3.9 ltr v-8. That thing would sing to the moon!
-
Much better then the prototype IMO. I can't wait to see the numbers it puts down. And if they do a SS package.
I just hope that they dont do the same old push rod motor that they have been doing for decades!
Honestly how old is the 3.8 liter v-6?? and there still using it? (last I cared to check)
What's wrong with the pushrod motor?
Of course, I'm a bit biased. I love my LS3 6.2L.
I'm thinking it will be powered by the LS2 6.0L 400 h.p. motor.
~Brian
-
here are the specs
(http://www.5thgen.org/images/2010Production/2010CamaroSpecs2A.jpg)
-
So they did go with the LS3, slightly detuned from the Corvette at 430 hp.
Wow.
~Brian
-
honestly not a fan of the body. interior is f*ckin amazing! :jaw:
The wheels even look like a copy of the SRT-8 wheels off the charger ???
-
ERMAHGERD it does'nt have the 3.8ltr in it!!!!lolollolo
The v-6 has more compression though...?? 11.3 WOW talk about border line. Get some bad gas in a po dunk town and say hello to the knock.
-
300 horsepower V6?
Same horsepower as a Mustang GT V8 with two less cylinders?
:rofl:
~Brian
-
Much better then the prototype IMO. I can't wait to see the numbers it puts down. And if they do a SS package.
I just hope that they dont do the same old push rod motor that they have been doing for decades!
Honestly how old is the 3.8 liter v-6?? and there still using it? (last I cared to check)
What's wrong with the pushrod motor?
Of course, I'm a bit biased. I love my LS3 6.2L.
I'm thinking it will be powered by the LS2 6.0L 400 h.p. motor.
~Brian
no problem with pushrods in general, just that 3.8 liter p.o.s. And rebadging them and calling them a new motor, when it is the same one in every other gm car on the road. And GM is not the only one guilty of this, either.
-
300 horsepower V6?
Same horsepower as a Mustang GT V8 with two less cylinders?
:rofl:
~Brian
:owned:
-
Looks like they will offer two V8 engines......They will offer a 4.3L V8 (L99*).
*A 4.3 L version of the LT1, designated the L99, was introduced in 1994 for the Chevrolet Caprice. It was externally identical to the LT1, but the bore was reduced to 3.736" and the stroke to 3.00" (similar to the late sixties Chevrolet 302 used in the first-generation Camaro Z28s). The pistons used in the L99 were the same as the ones used in the Vortec 5000 with the use of 5.94" connecting rods.
~Brian
-
Every cars debute year its always on top, thats why the re-design them. Ford is due for a revamp soon, so we shall see. Ford has been taking some BIG steps in the right dirrection recently.
-
Looks like they will offer two V8 engines......They will offer a 4.3L V8 (L99*).
*A 4.3 L version of the LT1, designated the L99, was introduced in 1994 for the Chevrolet Caprice. It was externally identical to the LT1, but the bore was reduced to 3.736" and the stroke to 3.00" (similar to the late sixties Chevrolet 302 used in the first-generation Camaro Z28s). The pistons used in the L99 were the same as the ones used in the Vortec 5000 with the use of 5.94" connecting rods.
~Brian
LOL way to go chevy, put in an old Caprice motor in a bad ass new car....lol. LT1 would have been one of the last motors I would have thought they would have put in there new flagship sports car.
-
Every cars debute year its always on top, thats why the re-design them. Ford is due for a revamp soon, so we shall see. Ford has been taking some BIG steps in the right dirrection recently.
with what? :lol:
-
Every cars debute year its always on top, thats why the re-design them. Ford is due for a revamp soon, so we shall see. Ford has been taking some BIG steps in the right dirrection recently.
with what? :lol:
Quality :bird: :bird: Have you ridden in a newer (06 and above) Ford of anykind? It does'nt feel like a typical american car.
-
IMO this is gonna be like 1970-73 all over again.
Badass cars rolling of the assembly line, then WAM!!! here come the Pintos, Pacers, and chevette's :'(
-
Every cars debute year its always on top, thats why the re-design them. Ford is due for a revamp soon, so we shall see. Ford has been taking some BIG steps in the right dirrection recently.
with what? :lol:
Quality :bird: :bird: Have you ridden in a newer (06 and above) Ford of anykind? It does'nt feel like a typical american car.
Yeah, not so bad, just razzin ya'. I really liked the Ford 500 we rented out in Cali. Had a CVT. Was nice in the mountains. No shifting of the trranny all the time. :thumbs: The EDGE is nice too. Shared with Mazda. I haven't ever really liked their light duty trucks, though. Heavy DUty diesels are still good
IMO this is gonna be like 1970-73 all over again.
Badass cars rolling of the assembly line, then WAM!!! here come the Pintos, Pacers, and chevette's :'(
great post COlorado. ANd the mustang II :( It is a fuel crisis again, so you may not be far off.
-
Looks like they will offer two V8 engines......They will offer a 4.3L V8 (L99*).
*A 4.3 L version of the LT1, designated the L99, was introduced in 1994 for the Chevrolet Caprice. It was externally identical to the LT1, but the bore was reduced to 3.736" and the stroke to 3.00" (similar to the late sixties Chevrolet 302 used in the first-generation Camaro Z28s). The pistons used in the L99 were the same as the ones used in the Vortec 5000 with the use of 5.94" connecting rods.
~Brian
LOL way to go chevy, put in an old Caprice motor in a bad ass new car....lol. LT1 would have been one of the last motors I would have thought they would have put in there new flagship sports car.
The new L99 (400 horsepower) still produces more than the Mustang!
~Brian
-
The production pics I had seen make it look alot different than the prototype.... but maybe it just needed some cool camera angles :lol:
And I like the Challenger line... :grin_nod:
(http://i227.photobucket.com/albums/dd6/pw383426/c53.jpg)
(http://i227.photobucket.com/albums/dd6/pw383426/c52.jpg)
(http://i227.photobucket.com/albums/dd6/pw383426/DSC00047.jpg)
-
If you want to start talking optional motors then why not bring up the GT500 :P :P
I dont care, I know that chevy LS motors make serious power, I've whitness my buddies 69 chevelle with 6.0 truck motor with a giant turbo put down over 1100 HP. ERMAHGERD thats a fun car. The car is full weight and not tubed out will carry the front tires for the first 60' of the track.
-
Every cars debute year its always on top, thats why the re-design them. Ford is due for a revamp soon, so we shall see. Ford has been taking some BIG steps in the right dirrection recently.
I would call losing billions taking big steps also, Backwards :lol:
-
The SS package will be out next year, but the following year the Z-28 will be back making more power than the SS. I know that sounds crazy and reverse.
-
Every cars debute year its always on top, thats why the re-design them. Ford is due for a revamp soon, so we shall see. Ford has been taking some BIG steps in the right dirrection recently.
I would call losing billions taking big steps also, Backwards :lol:
The fact that Ford floods the market with Mustangs every year really doesn't help matters much, in fact it kills the guy that has just dropped $50 grand for that Mustang GT500. That guy is lucky if his car is worth $30K after the first year. I wish they would scale things back like they did with the GT40. Decreasing production numbers on the GT and the V6 Coupe would help justify that $50K price tag on upscale models.
~Brian
-
Every cars debute year its always on top, thats why the re-design them. Ford is due for a revamp soon, so we shall see. Ford has been taking some BIG steps in the right dirrection recently.
I would call losing billions taking big steps also, Backwards :lol:
:rofl: preddy, no offense but..... :owned: :rofl: j/k
-
there will be one in our driveway in the 9's when they come out. i promise
-
there will be one in our driveway in the 9's when they come out. i promise
I think that 6 banger should hit that in the 1/8th :lol:
-
there will be one in our driveway in the 9's when they come out. i promise
I think that 6 banger should hit that in the 1/8th :lol:
nah the bigger motor one we will have in the 9's in the 1/4 :clap:
-
I've debated on buying one myself for the wife.....I'll wait until the GMS pricing is available on them.
~Brian
-
I've debated on buying one myself for the wife.....I'll wait until the GMS pricing is available on them.
~Brian
Same here, I doubt it will for awhile though Bass Turds :mad:
-
After the first year, I'm sure it will come out......but if they mass produce them like a Mustang, I'll be out. I don't want to see one on every corner like a Mustang.
~Brian
-
IMO this is gonna be like 1970-73 all over again.
Badass cars rolling of the assembly line, then WAM!!! here come the Pintos, Pacers, and chevette's :'(
BRING ON THE PACER AND THE CHEVETTE!!!!!!!!! :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
It's my goal before I die to turn a Pacer into a fish tank. :grin_nod: :thumbs:
-
I'm sure they will be B. They are out to beat the stang, so their production #s will have to be close too. But, the fuel crunch might change all of that.
Like I said bring on the Pacers :'(
-
Pacer fish tank?
Cool idea....Have the ass end hanging out of the wall with fish in it.....Wayn'es World One and Two movie posters on each side.
You would shit if you seen what we can buy Mustangs for right now.
CHEAP.
A car with a $25,000 window sticker V6 car, mileage around 10K is going for $12400-13500 at the auction now.
~Brian
-
I believe it, but thats nothing new for the stangs. look at the 1965 production numbers ::)
And since we're talking about stang's and Pacers, do you remember their evil stepchild........The Fox body Capri.
:lol:
-
I believe it, but thats nothing new for the stangs. look at the 1965 production numbers ::)
And since we're talking about stang's and Pacers, do you remember their evil stepchild........The Fox body Capri.
:lol:
Now that was a sexy car :wtf:
-
The Mercury Capri?
~Brian
-
The Mercury Capri?
~Brian
Yep, the second coming of the bubble window :lol:
-
Uber gay.
~Brian
-
The Mercury Capri?
~Brian
Yep, the second coming of the bubble window :lol:
my second car was an 86 Capri (mustang) with that big ass bubble window. Hunk O' Junk! Slow as molasses.
-
Motor Trend and Edmunds have both tested the new Camaro
Link: Motor Trend's Test (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3VHlOvE2pI)
Link: Edmunds Test (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJrR8QI9iaQ)
Motor Trend had a better 0-60 time.
Edmunds compared the Mustang, Camaro, and Challenger R/T and picked the Camaro 1st, Mustang 2nd, and the Challenger 3rd.
~Brian
-
The first shipment of Camaros is on it's way to dealerships!
(http://www.camaro5.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=19239&stc=1&d=1238530829)
The black car and silver car on the bottom are going to Rick Hendrick. Vin #100001 and Vin #100002
~Brian
-
I will be visiting the Hendrick cars.... The Chevy LSX pushrod motors are just simply the best thing out there. Trust me, lots of us old school Chevy guys were very resistant to the change. I saw some info that showed GM having 0 catastrophic engine failures per million units, and Toyota was next best with 14 :thumbs: Us Chevy guys got beat up on with the 5.0 in the 80's and 90's. Once the LS-1 came out, Ford just never could match it without a supercharger(and many times not then). The best thing about Chevy is when they told us we were making 325 hp at the flywheel ('02 SS), we would steady knock off 315-318 at the tires with a stock motor! The Mustang claimed 300 and would lay down 200 at the tires......There was a big shakeup over that deal! The new Camaro is knocking off 13 flat on street tires......A set of headers and sticky tires are gonna put this thing in the mid 12's, maybe better. WOW!
Everyone I know is impressed by the stunning looks of the Mustang, and it is a beauty for sure, but we would only consider it as the wife's car. The Challenger is another stunning car, but it doesn't take much time dealing with the Hemi to know you are dealing with a fuel injected version of the same old stuff. I love the Hemi for it's looks though....... :clap:
-
I'm a huge fan of pushrod motors. You're right, GM took a licking in the 80's and early 90's until the LT-1 made it out on the scene. That Camaro was a 14 second car on stock tires, with a 165 mph top speed. A speed that today's Mustang GT can't reach.
The Mustang has a cool look, but it's the same car as last year's model with slight refinements. Of course they offer the GT500, GT500KR and the Super Snake, but for $70-80 grand, I'd buy a Z06 and hand them their ass.
I'm a huge fan of the LS3 motor in my car. To think it pushes the the Camaro through the quarter mile at 13 seconds and 0 to 60 in 4.6 seconds is amazing. Ford will still continue to outsell the Camaro due to the act they produce 135,000 units a year vs. Camaro and less than half of that number.
~Brian
-
I think the Mustang has historically outsold the Camaro. I am a little torn by what Chevy did here. They built a car that "feels" like a 67-68 on the outside and a 69 on the inside. Then they put it through the wind tunnel to make it functional. Ford and Chrysler decided to make aerodynamic bricks to keep the look which may end up being the better marketing tool. I hope this car does well in sales just to keep the Camaro name alive.
I think the L-99 moniker is just a rehash number. As far as I can tell the Camaro L-99 is a LS based motor. You know, much like the L-92 in the truck like is lightyears ahead of the L-92 TPI in my 91 B4C Z/28. Nothing was shared except the name on the valve covers.
-
The Mustang has a cool look, but it's the same car as last year's model with slight refinements. Of course they offer the GT500, GT500KR and the Super Snake, but for $70-80 grand, I'd buy a Z06 and hand them their ass.
~Brian
Don't forget about the 03-04 Cobras. Those were WICKED cars, with a very resonable price tag. With VERY little work you have your self a over 500RWHP car.
If you feel like droping 3500 on a twin turbo set-up (yes, ontop of the supercharger) your making over 1000RWHP on pump gas. With the only supporting mod needed is a clutch.
-
300 horsepower V6?
Same horsepower as a Mustang GT V8 with two less cylinders?
:rofl:
~Brian
LMAO, Mustang owners :owned:...... :rofl:
-
300 horsepower V6?
Same horsepower as a Mustang GT V8 with two less cylinders?
:rofl:
~Brian
LMAO, Mustang owners :owned:...... :rofl:
You dont see me rubbing in the 80-90 Camaro. I remember reading there was a year of Camaro that had something like 84RWHP. :clap: Chevy :clap:
-
I think the Mustang has historically outsold the Camaro. I am a little torn by what Chevy did here. They built a car that "feels" like a 67-68 on the outside and a 69 on the inside. Then they put it through the wind tunnel to make it functional. Ford and Chrysler decided to make aerodynamic bricks to keep the look which may end up being the better marketing tool. I hope this car does well in sales just to keep the Camaro name alive.
I think the L-99 moniker is just a rehash number. As far as I can tell the Camaro L-99 is a LS based motor. You know, much like the L-92 in the truck like is lightyears ahead of the L-92 TPI in my 91 B4C Z/28. Nothing was shared except the name on the valve covers.
L-99 is the newest engine in the 2010 Camaro's lineup. The L-99's block, cylinder heads, crankshaft, and connecting rods-along with the intake manifold and throttle body are all shared with the LS3. The L99 is best thought of as a "higher-tech" LS3. It features Active Fuel Management (like in the like Pontiac's G8 and Holden's Commodore) and Variable Valve Timing.
~Brian
-
The Mustang has a cool look, but it's the same car as last year's model with slight refinements. Of course they offer the GT500, GT500KR and the Super Snake, but for $70-80 grand, I'd buy a Z06 and hand them their ass.
~Brian
Don't forget about the 03-04 Cobras. Those were WICKED cars, with a very resonable price tag. With VERY little work you have your self a over 500RWHP car.
If you feel like droping 3500 on a twin turbo set-up (yes, ontop of the supercharger) your making over 1000RWHP on pump gas. With the only supporting mod needed is a clutch.
The thing that stands out with the Cobra, IRS and an underated engine. A few quick bolt ons and you were cooking with 500hp!!!!
It's a shame the Mustang GT500 is on a wagon axle.
~Brian
-
The Mustang has a cool look, but it's the same car as last year's model with slight refinements. Of course they offer the GT500, GT500KR and the Super Snake, but for $70-80 grand, I'd buy a Z06 and hand them their ass.
~Brian
Don't forget about the 03-04 Cobras. Those were WICKED cars, with a very resonable price tag. With VERY little work you have your self a over 500RWHP car.
If you feel like droping 3500 on a twin turbo set-up (yes, ontop of the supercharger) your making over 1000RWHP on pump gas. With the only supporting mod needed is a clutch.
The thing that stands out with the Cobra, IRS and an underated engine. A few quick bolt ons and you were cooking with 500hp!!!!
It's a shame the Mustang GT500 is on a wagon axle.
~Brian
Yea, I dont understand Ford sometimes. They really had a good, unique car on their hands, then dumped after two years. IRS on a sports car could be very cool. LOL, kinda like the Polaris Outlaw. :rofl:
I LOVE the sound of the Supercharger on the Cobras. WICKED!
Not to many motors out there will handle 1000+HP with NO internal mods.
-
I think the Mustang has historically outsold the Camaro. I am a little torn by what Chevy did here. They built a car that "feels" like a 67-68 on the outside and a 69 on the inside. Then they put it through the wind tunnel to make it functional. Ford and Chrysler decided to make aerodynamic bricks to keep the look which may end up being the better marketing tool. I hope this car does well in sales just to keep the Camaro name alive.
I think the L-99 moniker is just a rehash number. As far as I can tell the Camaro L-99 is a LS based motor. You know, much like the L-92 in the truck like is lightyears ahead of the L-92 TPI in my 91 B4C Z/28. Nothing was shared except the name on the valve covers.
Kenny's Z-28 is a fully equiped anti-hippie machine :lol:
-
300 horsepower V6?
Same horsepower as a Mustang GT V8 with two less cylinders?
:rofl:
~Brian
LMAO, Mustang owners :owned:...... :rofl:
You dont see me rubbing in the 80-90 Camaro. I remember reading there was a year of Camaro that had something like 84RWHP. :clap: Chevy :clap:
You must be refering to the 4 cylinder Camaro that was available in the 80's. It was the LQ9 L4. It had 88 horsepower.
The Mustang in 1980's had a motor that was identical. It was a 2.3L that also produced 88 hp.
1995 was the last year for the Mustang to have any balls. The 5.0L motor was the best motor ever in the Mustang in my opinion. There were two, versions of the 5.0L The 210 hp version and the 240 hp Cobra version.
Cobra also had the 5.8L that was rated at 300, but was closer to 330-340hp. Awesome motor.
The 1992 Camaro (3rd Generation) was the last for GM's five motor choices. The 5.0L and 5.7L GM motors produced 230 and 245hp.
Then came the LT1 and GM got their manhood back.
~Brian
-
300 horsepower V6?
Same horsepower as a Mustang GT V8 with two less cylinders?
:rofl:
~Brian
LMAO, Mustang owners :owned:...... :rofl:
You dont see me rubbing in the 80-90 Camaro. I remember reading there was a year of Camaro that had something like 84RWHP. :clap: Chevy :clap:
You must be refering to the 4 cylinder Camaro that was available in the 80's. It was the LQ9 L4. It had 88 horsepower.
The Mustang in 1980's had a motor that was identical. It was a 2.3L that also produced 88 hp.
1995 was the last year for the Mustang to have any balls. The 5.0L motor was the best motor ever in the Mustang in my opinion. There were two, versions of the 5.0L The 210 hp version and the 240 hp Cobra version.
Cobra also had the 5.8L that was rated at 300, but was closer to 330-340hp. Awesome motor.
The 1992 Camaro (3rd Generation) was the last for GM's five motor choices. The 5.0L and 5.7L GM motors produced 230 and 245hp.
Then came the LT1 and GM got their manhood back.
~Brian
Then Ford cought on and turbo charged it. Have you ever seen a well modded SVO run. Hardest runnin 4 cylinders you'll ever see!! Flat out amazing! Another example of a good motor de-tuned to chit :rofl:
-
The Mustang has a cool look, but it's the same car as last year's model with slight refinements. Of course they offer the GT500, GT500KR and the Super Snake, but for $70-80 grand, I'd buy a Z06 and hand them their ass.
~Brian
Don't forget about the 03-04 Cobras. Those were WICKED cars, with a very resonable price tag. With VERY little work you have your self a over 500RWHP car.
If you feel like droping 3500 on a twin turbo set-up (yes, ontop of the supercharger) your making over 1000RWHP on pump gas. With the only supporting mod needed is a clutch.
The thing that stands out with the Cobra, IRS and an underated engine. A few quick bolt ons and you were cooking with 500hp!!!!
It's a shame the Mustang GT500 is on a wagon axle.
~Brian
Yea, I dont understand Ford sometimes. They really had a good, unique car on their hands, then dumped after two years. IRS on a sports car could be very cool. LOL, kinda like the Polaris Outlaw. :rofl:
I LOVE the sound of the Supercharger on the Cobras. WICKED!
Not to many motors out there will handle 1000+HP with NO internal mods.
Oh yeah, love that whine!!!!
Too bad they have to strap a supercharger on it to make 500+ horsepower. :lol: Just kidding.
Strap a supercharger on an LS3 and you'll make 650-700 by changing the injectors only. Add one to the LS7 and make 850-900.
Of course, if you want the warranty, you'll have to pony up $115K for the 638hp LS9 powered Zr1.
~Brian
-
The engine in the GT40 was pimp as shit, but Ford hit the brakes on that car in 2006. They are still bringing big bucks on low mileage rides.
~Brian
-
The engine in the GT40 was pimp as shit, but Ford hit the brakes on that car in 2006. They are still bringing big bucks on low mileage rides.
~Brian
I ALMOST got to do the PDI (pre-delivery inspection) on a GT-40, but quit the job a month before they hit the floor.
Did you see the Car & Driver front cover? "Return Of The Ferrari Slayer" When the GT-40 hit the streets.
-
The engine in the GT40 was pimp as shit, but Ford hit the brakes on that car in 2006. They are still bringing big bucks on low mileage rides.
~Brian
I ALMOST got to do the PDI (pre-delivery inspection) on a GT-40, but quit the job a month before they hit the floor.
Did you see the Car & Driver front cover? "Return Of The Ferrari Slayer" When the GT-40 hit the streets.
I remember that.
4038 built.
Low drag helped it achieve remarkable highway speeds.
~Brian
-
FINE!! Let's break back into some history! Typhoon and Syclone baby! Nuff said :grin_nod:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iILmeORbV4&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czbgsArMA38&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_W_dlWYpFo&NR=1
-
Show me a 4 cylinder chevy pull the front tires off the ground. :clap: :clap:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BH8rBJXz6d0
-
:lol: That was kewl! We used to run the 2300 in our mini stocks, but they wouldn't do that :lol:
-
Show me a 4 cylinder chevy pull the front tires off the ground. :clap: :clap:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BH8rBJXz6d0
Reading comments: krazykyle23211 asks "is it stock" :lol:
-
Show me a 4 cylinder chevy pull the front tires off the ground. :clap: :clap:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BH8rBJXz6d0
I had a 4x4 s-10 blazer that I almost rolled over backwards up a hill with a 4tech in it. :lol:
Does that count?
-
Show me a 4 cylinder chevy pull the front tires off the ground. :clap: :clap:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BH8rBJXz6d0
Here's an S-10 that can : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cO0n9nTF4zU&feature=related
~Brian
-
Bryan have you test driven a 2010 camaro yet?
i just saw one at the nearst dealer. and :nana:
-
Our first one should be here next week.
It's only a 6 cylinder.
Our next two are LS3 6.2L V-8's
~Brian
-
Our first one should be here next week.
It's only a 6 cylinder.
Our next two are LS3 6.2L V-8's
~Brian
Saw 8 of them on a trailer yesterday. not a bad lookin' car. Won't buy one, but at least it looks nice.
-
Our first one should be here next week.
It's only a 6 cylinder.
Our next two are LS3 6.2L V-8's
~Brian
who the hell would buy a 6 cylinder camaro ???
What was the price difference between the LS3 and the 6-cylinder?
-
Our first one should be here next week.
It's only a 6 cylinder.
Our next two are LS3 6.2L V-8's
~Brian
who the hell would buy a 6 cylinder camaro ???
What was the price difference between the LS3 and the 6-cylinder?
The 6 cylinder is 304 hp. A Mustang Gt is only 315 hp.
Cost of the V8 vs. V6? Big difference.
10-15K depending on equipment.
Plus, they are all bringing $5,000 over sticker!
~Brian
-
5k over sticker :rofl: Not around here (live in bakersfield)
The one I saw was in the Corcoran chevy dealer. they wanted sticker price 37k for a 2ss auto with all the options minus moon roof.
-
Someone should jump on that quick.
All the ones around here are $5-10K over.
~Brian
-
I want one of these. Any one of these.
excerpt: Not pleased with recently taking the back seat to Hennessey Motorsport in the LS-tuning circle, Lingenfelter has upped the ante by beginning development on its very own version of the 2010 Chevy Camaro SS. Their plan is to release five distinct power packages ranging from a supercharged 550-horsepower model all the way up to a monster 800-horsepower, turbocharged, LS7-swapped version that we're going to talk about a little more.
http://jalopnik.com/5242628/turbo-ls7+powered-800-hp-lingenfelter-camaro-ss-mullet+mobile
(http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/jalopnik/2009/05/Lingenfelter_Camaro_SS_Jalopnik-topshot.jpg)
-
That's sick!
~Brian
-
I saw a Z06 turbo last night....I about shit my pants. He got on it for me.....VERY sweet.
~Brian
-
Here's our first one.
(http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c355/Flynbyu1973/Corvette%20pictures/Camaro.jpg)
~Brian
-
Nice , Is it sold?
-
Nice , Is it sold?
No, we have two deals in finance on it now....Neither are approved.
~Brian
-
The Camaro Mullet Mafia must has shitty credit :lol:
-
:nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana:
-
The Camaro Mullet Mafia must has shitty credit :lol:
Tough market, that's for sure.
Plus it's over sticker.
~Brian
-
I sold the 2010 Camaro 1SS 6spd to a friend of mine for $5000 over sticker today.
Car should be here next Friday. It's in route from the Great White Nort.
~Brian
-
My friend Kevin is the proud owner of a new Camaro SS.
(http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c355/Flynbyu1973/Corvette%20pictures/CamaroSS1.jpg)
(http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c355/Flynbyu1973/Corvette%20pictures/CamaroSS2.jpg)
(http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c355/Flynbyu1973/Corvette%20pictures/CamaroSS3-1.jpg)
His signature burnout he does in EVERYTHING he buys from me.
(http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c355/Flynbyu1973/Corvette%20pictures/CamaroSS3.jpg)
~Brian
-
they need to either put a larger rim/tire on, or drop that bitch 1-1 1/2. Just like the mustangs, they're too tall looking stock
-
Nice looking ride. I agree with Aaron though. Got so close to looking perfect, why not go the next step? Makes it look cheap, which it is not.
-
It's an optical illusion, the car is a little lower than what it seems. The 20's on this car look really sweet. It also has Brembo brakes!!!
~Brian
-
Badass...The wifeys next ride.
-
Wait until the convertible comes out in a year or so.....That's a sweet machine.
~Brian
-
Yeah it will be next year around April or so before we get it. Not too sure about the convertible though. Is there going to be a T-Top option?
-
No, they only offer them with a sunroof at this time. I doubt the t-top will be an option.
~Brian
-
No, they only offer them with a sunroof at this time. I doubt the t-top will be an option.
~Brian
:(
Gotta have primer finish and t-tops as an option. And mismatched front and rear wheels. "the midwest edition" :lol:
-
No, they only offer them with a sunroof at this time. I doubt the t-top will be an option.
~Brian
:(
Gotta have primer finish and t-tops as an option. And mismatched front and rear wheels. "the midwest edition" :lol:
Primer = Oklahoma chrome.
~Brian